Software Image Enhancing.
Merupakan perisian komputer yg banyak digunakan utk mencantikkan lagi sesuatu gambar. Zaman sekarang bnyk org tau dan tak kurang pula ingin belajar menggunakan perisian ni. Bila dah tau, macam-macam boleh dilakukan. Kesan dari penggunaan perisian ni ada baik dan buruknya.
Contoh seperti gambar dibawah ni.Confirm anda boleh lihat perbezaan yg agak ketara.Walaupun tak sepenuhnya di modify...tapi nampak jugakla bezanye..
Kami sekadar ingin berkongsi dgn visitor ttg kehebatan perisian ni. Kami harap anda bijak menilai dimana dan bagaimana sepatutnya perisian ini sesuai digunakan. Terkadang ada gambar-gambar di laman web tertentu menggunakannya. Jadi mcmana kita nak lihat keaslian/originality?Of course la mana2 gambar yg sudah di edit confirm nampak cantik,glamor dan vogue!
Di andamanaby.com, kami TIDAK menggunakan perisian ini utk bagi tujuan tersebut. Semua gambar pengantin yg kami make-up adalah gambar asli (JPEG/JPG/RAW) dari camera digital (Lumix DMC-FX35 yg banyak berjasa)...dan baru-baru ni jer ada rezeki dapatlah andamanaby.com membeli sebuah kamera Digital SLR Canon eos 450D.Adanya kamera ini,InsyaAllah anda boleh melihat dgn lebih jelas.Boleh sgt ndamanaby.com nak edit gambar2 ni utk view yg lebih menarik, tapi andamanaby.com rasa 'tidak baik' cara begitu...
Gambar ni andamanaby.com terjumpa kat satu laman web. Bila diteliti,dikaji dieksperimentasi..mcm gambar ni dah modify.Tambah pulak tu, tak di ZOOM lebih dekat..ambik shoot jauh..tapi gambar before make-up close-up dekat2..bila nak show gambar after make-up..jauh pulak.. Sekadar ingin berkongsi..hidup kena bantu-membantu.
Gambar disebelah ni..diambil dari sebuah 'blog'.Sekali pandang mmg cantik.Tapi bila di Zoom-in...nyata terdapat editing/touch-up.Sebenarnya bila dah diedit/touch-up...foto nenek boleh jadi anak dara kembali.Namun adakalanya foto perlu juga editing pada sesetengah keadaan. Anda dpt perhatikan ada kesan 'Blur' - Kebiasaan dlm dunia foto kecantikan effect yg biasa digunakan 'blurring effect' utk kasi nampak kulit seseorang itu kelihatan flawless,smooth,licin dan lain2 lagi.Banyak lagi effect yg boleh digunakan.Jika anda punyai masa dan azam anda sendiri berkebolehan touch-up & editing foto dgn mempelajari perisian tertentu..tak mustahil anda juga boleh membuat sendiri foto2 perkahwinan anda..jimat duit....
ZOOM IN lebih dekat - lebih clear! andamanaby.com suka dgn cara ni.Inilah trademark dan cara tersendiri.Gambar before and after 
make-up di ZOOM IN lebih dekat. Dengan cara ni,visitor dpt melihat dgn lebih jelas lagi..terkadang hampir mustahil utk menghilangkan parut,jerawat batu dan kesan yg tahap kritikal dimuka...Namun tidak dinafikan..setiap individu ada cara tersendiri 'melenyapkan' sementara kesan2 ini..jadi ada baiknya perkara ini diserahkan pada visitor utk menilainya tanpa foto2 tu di edit/touch-up dulu... "Apa yg baik adalah dari ALLAH..dan apa yg buruk adalah dari kelemahan diri manusia itu..."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How to detect a fake
Spotting fake photos and forgeries doesn't always require high-powered algorithms. While image manipulation software is now easier to use, it still takes considerable skill to wield the tools well, says Cynthia Baron, author of "Photoshop Forensics."
"We're an intensively visual society, and yet we're not very good at visually scrutinizing," Ms. Baron says. But if you know what to look for, there are many ways to tell. Here are a few:
•
Frankenstein images. A favorite trick is digitally sewing a celebrity's head onto another's body. Earlier this month, the Republican Party of Kentucky printed a campaign brochure with a fake photo of the Democratic candidate for governor, Steve Beshear, looking sleazy in a casino. The image is labeled "not an actual photo" and was designed to mock the candidate's stance on gambling. But the picture also demonstrates two clear signs of a stitched photo: an unnatural tilt of the head and an awkward seam where the head meets the collarbone.
•
Too-straight lines. Few unmanipulated photos contain 90-degree angles. But computers love square corners. If a protester's sign has a perfectly straight edge all the way around it, it might be a fake.
•
Recurring objects and patterns. After an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon last August, the Reuters news agency website ran a photo of smoke billowing from a building. But one of the thick puffs had a repeating pattern – an obvious signal, Baron says, that the photographer had copied and pasted parts of the image to make the damage look more severe.
•
Truth in shadows. Manipulators often create collages without making sure that the lighting on all the objects matches up. An astute viewer can pick out such inconsistencies.
•
If it looks too good to be true, it probably is. Andy Roddick surprised even himself when he saw the June-July cover of Men's Fitness magazine. In the image, the tennis star's biceps appear thicker than the Wimbledon trophy. "Pretty sure I'm not as fit as the Men's Fitness cover suggests," he jokes on his blog. "Little did I know I have 22-inch guns and a disappearing birth mark on my right arm." Oops.
** source from http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0829/p13s02-stct.html?page=2
